The Q/V/M Framework
Every stock in our universe receives three independent scores, each on a 0–100 scale. These map to the three dimensions that academic research and practitioner experience have shown to drive long-term returns:
Quality
Is this a well-run business with durable competitive advantages?
Value
Is the stock cheap relative to its fundamentals?
Momentum
Are price and earnings trends moving in the right direction?
Each pillar is built from multiple underlying factors, weighted by the strength of the evidence behind them. The factors are all listed below; the precise weights are our secret sauce. You can see every stock's pillar scores and factor-level breakdown on its own page in Ranked Stocks, or filter on them directly in the Screener.
Quality Factors
Quality captures franchise strength and financial health in three groups. Franchise metrics carry the most weight: a durable moat matters more than any single balance-sheet ratio.
- Franchise Quality
- Return on Invested Capital, Return on Equity, Gross Profit to Assets (Novy-Marx's profitability factor), operating margin, and Free Cash Flow to Assets. High, stable returns on capital signal a durable moat; the cash-flow checks catch profits that exist only on paper.
- Piotroski F-Score
- A year-over-year checklist covering profitability, cash-flow quality, leverage change, and operating efficiency. Improving fundamentals score; deteriorating ones don't.
- Balance-Sheet Safety
- Debt-to-equity, current ratio, and interest coverage. Lower leverage and comfortable debt service mean less fragility in downturns.
Two fairness rules keep these ratios honest. First, profitability metrics are measured on trailing-twelve-month data wherever four clean quarters exist, so a company mid-turnaround is scored on where it is now, not on a fiscal year that ended twelve months ago. Second, companies whose book equity has gone negative purely through years of buybacks (a shareholder-friendly behaviour, not distress) are scored neutrally on the equity ratios rather than penalised for a mathematically undefined number.
Value Factors
Value compares market price to fundamental anchors. We use six trailing ratios, never forward estimates, so no single metric's blind spot dominates:
- Price-to-Earnings
- The classic multiple, on trailing twelve-month earnings, compared within each sector.
- EV/EBITDA
- Enterprise value over operating earnings normalises for capital-structure differences, so a leveraged business can't look artificially cheap.
- Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow
- Rewards companies generating real cash, not just accounting profits. The hardest ratio to manipulate.
- Price-to-Book
- The Fama-French anchor, most informative for asset-heavy sectors.
- Dividend Yield
- Computed from dividends actually paid over the trailing twelve months: a tangible return that also signals management confidence in cash flows.
- Price-to-Sales
- Useful for cyclical or early-stage businesses where earnings are volatile.
Momentum Factors
Momentum captures the market's own signal. Price trend sets the tone; earnings trend confirms it:
- Price Momentum
- Proximity to the 52-week high (George & Hwang's strongest single price signal), 6-month relative strength versus the benchmark, and the 50-day/200-day moving-average ratio as trend confirmation. We deliberately exclude the most recent-month window, which sits in short-term reversal noise.
- Earnings Momentum
- Analyst EPS revisions over the last 4 and 12 weeks, the spread between forward and trailing EPS, and quarterly earnings growth. Upward revisions are one of the best-documented leading indicators of further gains.
How Scoring Works
Raw fundamentals are transformed into comparable scores through a multi-step process designed to be fair across sectors, current rather than stale, and robust to missing data.
- Trailing-Twelve-Month Basis
- Profitability, cash-flow, and valuation inputs are measured on the trailing twelve months wherever a clean TTM can be assembled from quarterly filings; balance-sheet items use the most recent quarter. Annual-report-based screeners can lag reality by a year on fast-moving businesses.
- Sector-Relative Percentiles
- Every metric is ranked within its sector, so a cheap utility doesn’t automatically beat an expensive tech stock. Apples are compared to apples.
- Thin-Sector Blending
- Sectors with fewer than 20 stocks get a weighted blend of sector and universe percentiles, preventing small-sample distortions.
- Missing Data Penalty
- Missing values receive a score of 25 (below median) rather than being ignored. No free passes for incomplete filings.
- StockRank Re-Percentiling
- The final score is the re-percentiled average of Quality + Value + Momentum. Re-percentiling spreads scores across the full 0–100 range, counteracting the Central Limit Theorem’s tendency to bunch averaged percentiles toward 50.
StockRank: The Composite Score
The three pillar scores are combined into a single StockRank from 0 to 100: a percentile against the whole universe, so a StockRank of 90 means the stock scores better than 90% of everything we cover.
Signal bands: Strong Buy 80–100, Buy 65–79, Hold 35–64, Sell 20–34, Strong Sell 0–19. Symmetric around the midpoint: the buy and sell gates are mirror images.
We don't ask you to take the ranking on faith. Every month we snapshot the universe into score deciles and track how each decile actually performs afterwards; if the model works, higher deciles should beat lower ones. A public Decile Tracker is in preparation and goes live once the current round of scoring refinements settles.
Insider & Buyback Signals
Alongside the quantitative score, we collect regulatory filings for director dealings, substantial-shareholder moves, and company share buybacks in 28 of our 30 markets, from SEC Form 4s and UK PDMR notices to Japan's 5%-rule reports and Hong Kong's disclosure register. Insiders buying with their own money, and companies retiring their own shares, are two of the most credible outside confirmations a thesis can get.
These signals appear as Director Trades and Buybacks tiles on every covered stock page, feed the screener's insider columns, and stream into the consolidated global insider feed.
AI Conviction Layer
Quantitative scores alone can miss breaking news: fraud allegations, regulatory action, or transformational deals. Our AI news filter adds a qualitative overlay.
For every stock that passes the quantitative screen, Google Gemini analyses recent news from DuckDuckGo, Finviz, SEC EDGAR, and NewsAPI. Each stock receives one of three verdicts:
The AI read the news and found nothing to worry about. Clear to buy.
Something uncertain in the headlines. No new buys, but existing positions are held.
Material risk spotted: fraud, regulatory action, or worse. Triggers an immediate sell review.
Stocks with missing AI verdicts default to FLAG as a safety measure: nothing gets a clean bill of health it hasn't earned. The highest-conviction names surface as AI Champions.
Macro Regime Detection
Stock picking doesn't happen in a vacuum. Four macro indicators are combined into a composite regime signal that frames how aggressively the model leans into its picks:
- VIX
- Implied volatility index. Elevated VIX signals market stress.
- Yield Curve
- 10Y minus 2Y Treasury spread. Inversion has historically preceded recessions.
- Credit Spreads
- Investment-grade corporate bond spreads over Treasuries. Widening spreads indicate tightening financial conditions.
- Fed Policy
- Federal funds rate trajectory and forward guidance tone.
The composite maps to three regimes: RISK_ON, NEUTRAL, and RISK_OFF. The current regime, and the market-by-market health picture behind it, is always live on Market Pulse.
Academic Foundations
Every factor in our scoring system traces back to peer-reviewed research. The table below summarises the key papers and their findings.
| Factor | Paper | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Value Factor | Fama & French (1992) | High book-to-market stocks earn ~4–5% annual premium. Foundation of modern factor investing. |
| Piotroski F-Score | Piotroski (2000) | Long-short F-Score portfolio returns ~7.5% annually over 1976–1996. |
| Gross Profitability | Novy-Marx (2013) | Profitable firms outperform unprofitable by ~4% annually. GP/Assets predicts returns as well as book-to-market. |
| Momentum | Jegadeesh & Titman (1993) | 12-month momentum yields ~12% annual premium. Short-term (1-month) reversals identified. |
| 52-Week High | George & Hwang (2004) | Proximity to 52-week high predicts returns better than past returns alone. |
| Multi-Factor | Asness, Frazzini & Pedersen (2019) | Combined factors reduce drawdowns 30–40% versus single-factor strategies. |
Disclaimer: The figures above are drawn from peer-reviewed academic research and reflect historical observations, not guarantees of future performance. This tool is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not predict future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions.
This methodology runs across 20,000+ stocks in 30 markets, every single day. Every stage is auditable: the pipeline stamps a manifest on completion, and downstream layers verify data freshness before running. No manual overrides. No gut feelings. Just structured, repeatable analysis you can trust.
See it applied: today's rankings, the screener, or any stock's full score breakdown on its own page.