AMN
Full HouseAI screen passAMN Healthcare Services, Inc. · Healthcare · United States · $1.9B cap · $35.0M/day traded
$37.42 -1.3% · close 12 Nov · scored 13 Nov
Full House: Strong business, sensible price, and the market agrees.
Around its 5 Nov results, analysts left next year's EPS estimate little changed.
As of 13 Nov 2026, the MoatMap Score for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) is 94/100, ranked against 25,000+ stocks in 38 markets (Quality 66, Value 78, Momentum 58, each scored against its sector).
Does the score work? Each tenth of the ranking, tracked monthly. See the record →
AMN Healthcare Services is a major US healthcare workforce solutions and staffing provider operating with solid profitability and robust cash flow. The company maintains an active share repurchase programme and steady consensus expectations as hospital staffing demand stabilizes following post-pandemic normalization.
ABOUT AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Read
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. is the largest healthcare staffing and workforce solutions company in the United States, offering a comprehensive suite of services including temporary and permanent placement of nurses, physicians, and allied health professionals. Its competitive moat is derived from its unmatched scale, broad service portfolio, proprietary technology platforms, and extensive network of healthcare providers, allowing it to efficiently match talent with critical needs. AMN is a market leader, providing essential support to healthcare systems facing staffing shortages and evolving patient demands.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY (USD)
| Year | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | CAGR | TTM | 2026E | 2027E | Fwd CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 5.2B | 3.8B | 3.0B | 2.7B | -19.5% | 3.5B | 3.4B | 2.7B | -1.1% |
| EPS | 9.96 | 5.38 | -3.85 | -2.48 | -46.0% | 2.74 | 4.20 | 0.94 | -35.4% |
| Shares | 41.9M | 37.8M | 38.1M | 38.4M | -8.2% | 38.7M | — | — | — |
| Debt | 861.0M | 1.4B | 1.1B | 803.2M | -2.3% | 743.4M | — | — | — |
| Equity | 1.0B | 831.3M | 706.6M | 642.1M | -14.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Op CF | 653.7M | 372.2M | 320.4M | 269.5M | -25.6% | 360.6M | — | — | — |
| Inv CF | -170.7M | -412.5M | -79.9M | 4.3M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fin CF | -591.9M | 10.7M | -259.4M | -295.9M | — | — | — | — | — |
No clear trend: not near its 52-week low, and not in a steady uptrend.
Swung more than 82% of stocks we rank over the past year (volatility 70% a year).
How this is worked out
The Price check reads only the chart, the price side of the Momentum score in words; it is not the MoatMap Score.
- Still falling: It set a new 52-week low in the last two weeks, after a deep fall.
- Finding a floor: It fell hard, but has set no new low for more than two weeks.
- Turning up: It has climbed off its low and is back above a rising 50-day average.
- In an uptrend: It is near its 52-week high and above its 200-day average.
- No clear trend (this stock): None of the above: no recent deep fall and no steady climb.
- No read yet: Not enough price history yet: it needs a year of trading.
In past US falls, waiting for Turning up cut the chance of another 20% drop from 42% to 33%. Returns were no better, and 33% of turns failed.
The exact rules
Still falling is a new 52-week low in the last two weeks, at least 25% below the high, with the low set after the high. Finding a floor is the same fall with no new low in the last two weeks. Turning up is 20 or more trading days without a new low, at least 10% off it, and back above a rising 50-day average. In an uptrend is above the 200-day average, with the 50-day average above the 200-day, and within 15% of the high. No clear trend is everything else. No read yet is under 252 trading days of history, or missing data. A new state shows once it has held for three trading days.
In 2,112 US drawdowns since 2001, buying while the price was still falling was followed by a further 20% drop 42% of the time. Waiting for a turn (the Turning up rule above) cut that to 33%, at about 7% higher prices and with no better returns. Part of that cut is simply not buying: 13% of falls never turned, and waiting kept those out. Among turns that were bought, 38% still fell another 20%, and 33% of turns were followed by a new low within six months. The benefit was largest in crashes such as 2008 and 2020.
What it measures: how much the price moved day to day over the past year, scaled to a yearly figure (annualised volatility) and ranked against every stock we cover. Very calm under 20% a year, Calm 20 to 30%, Average 30 to 40%, Bumpy 40 to 55%, Very bumpy above that.
What we found: across about 13,500 stocks in 34 markets (2002 to 2025), past swings were a good guide to the next year's, and bumpier stocks fell further. How much further changed too much between eras to put a number on it.
Calm is not safe: a calm stock can still slide steadily.
Rules fixed before any data was fetched. Describes the chart, not a recommendation.
SCORE BREAKDOWN
FUNDAMENTALS
SECTOR PEERS
Closest peers in Healthcare, ranked by industry match, size, and score similarity. Cross-listings of AMN are excluded.
| Ticker | Company | Mkt Cap | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMN | AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.(you) | $1.9B | 94 |
| HCSG | Healthcare Services Group, Inc. | $1.7B | 95 |
| ARDT | Ardent Health, Inc. | $1.7B | 97 |
| ADUS | Addus HomeCare Corporation | $2.3B | 95 |
| MD | Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. | $2.4B | 93 |
| NUTX | Nutex Health Inc. | $1.4B | 99 |
| GRDN | Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. | $2.5B | 88 |
| AVAH | Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc. | $2.9B | 90 |
| INNV | InnovAge Holding Corp. | $1.3B | 77 |
| CON | Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. | $5.0B | 86 |
Peer medians: ROE -31.0% · P/E 26.3x · Gross margin 63.3%
Company Deep Dive
A 10,000-word report: the business and its segments, what management promised on earnings calls and whether it delivered, the competition, and how things could turn out.