NAT
Premium GrowerAI neutralNordic American Tankers Limited · Energy · Bermuda · $1.7B cap · $33.6M/day traded
$6.72 +3.4% · close 11 Nov · scored 11 Nov
Premium Grower: Strong business with the market behind it, priced at a premium.
As of 11 Nov 2026, the MoatMap Score for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is 73/100, ranked against 25,000+ stocks in 38 markets (Quality 62, Value 37, Momentum 70, each scored against its sector).
Does the score work? Each tenth of the ranking, tracked monthly. See the record →
Nordic American Tankers owns a fleet of about 20 Suezmax crude tankers and pays out most of its cash as dividends. Longer voyages and disruption around the Gulf have lifted charter rates, and analysts raised forward earnings estimates by about 21% in a month. The earnings momentum is real. However, this is a pure commodity shipping business with an older fleet, no pricing power beyond the spot market and a long history of paying for dividends with new shares, so earnings can reverse quickly when rates fall back.
ABOUT NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS LIMITED
Read
Nordic American Tankers Limited is an international shipping company that operates a large, standardized fleet of Suezmax crude oil tankers. The company's competitive moat lies in its pure-play focus on the Suezmax asset class, which provides high operational flexibility and cost efficiencies in crew training, maintenance, and chartering. NAT is characterized by its conservative capital structure and a commitment to returning free cash flow to shareholders through a consistent, long-standing dividend policy.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY (USD)
| Year | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | CAGR | TTM | 2026E | 2027E | Fwd CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | 339.3M | 391.7M | 349.7M | 291.7M | -4.9% | 371.1M | 483.1M | 477.9M | 28.0% |
| EPS | -0.73 | 0.07 | 0.47 | 0.22 | 0.06 | -5.0% | 0.59 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 283.0% |
| Shares | — | 208.8M | 208.8M | 211.8M | 211.8M | +1.4% | 211.8M | — | — | — |
| Debt | — | 306.6M | 301.6M | 269.7M | 424.1M | 11.4% | 406.6M | — | — | — |
| Equity | — | 540.0M | 538.3M | 508.8M | 445.5M | -6.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Op CF | — | 24.1M | 139.4M | 128.2M | 19.8M | -6.3% | 117.9M | — | — | — |
| Inv CF | — | -14.3M | -73.7M | -2.6M | -87.7M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fin CF | — | 9.0M | -95.7M | -115.1M | 69.0M | — | — | — | — | — |
No clear trend: not near its 52-week low, and not in a steady uptrend.
Swung more than 50% of stocks we rank over the past year (volatility 42% a year).
How this is worked out
The MoatMap Score weighs the business, its price and its trend. The price check reads only the chart: the price side of the Momentum score, in words.
The rules: Still falling is a new 52-week low in the last two weeks, at least 25% below the high. Finding a floor is no new low since. Turning up is 20 or more trading days without a new low, at least 10% off it, and back above a rising 50-day average. In an uptrend is above the 200-day average and within 15% of the high.
In 2,112 US drawdowns since 2001, buying while the price was still falling was followed by a further 20% drop 42% of the time. Waiting for a turn (the Turning up rule above) cut that to 33%, at about 7% higher prices and with no better returns. Part of that cut is simply not buying: 13% of falls never turned, and waiting kept those out. Among turns that were bought, 38% still fell another 20%, and 33% of turns were followed by a new low within six months. The benefit was largest in crashes such as 2008 and 2020.
What it measures: how much the price moved day to day over the past year, scaled to a yearly figure (annualised volatility) and ranked against every stock we cover. Very calm under 20% a year, Calm 20 to 30%, Average 30 to 40%, Bumpy 40 to 55%, Very bumpy above that.
What we found: across about 13,500 stocks in 34 markets (2002 to 2025), past swings were a good guide to the next year's, and bumpier stocks fell further. How much further changed too much between eras to put a number on it.
Calm is not safe: a calm stock can still slide steadily.
Rules fixed before any data was fetched. Describes the chart, not a recommendation.
SCORE BREAKDOWN
FUNDAMENTALS
SECTOR PEERS
Closest peers in Energy, ranked by industry match, size, and score similarity. Cross-listings of NAT are excluded.
| Ticker | Company | Mkt Cap | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAT | Nordic American Tankers Limited(you) | $1.7B | 73 |
| TK | Teekay Corporation Ltd. | $1.3B | 91 |
| FLNG | FLEX LNG Ltd. | $1.5B | 41 |
| DHT | DHT Holdings, Inc. | $4.0B | 94 |
| TNK | Teekay Tankers Ltd. | $3.4B | 99 |
| GLNG | Golar LNG Limited | $4.7B | 18 |
| PLSV.OL | Paratus Energy Services Ltd. | $834M | 77 |
| GKP.L | Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited | $618M | 70 |
| NBR | Nabors Industries Ltd. | $1.2B | 53 |
| BWO.OL | BW Offshore Limited | $774M | 48 |
Peer medians: ROE 8.9% · P/E 11.1x · Gross margin 50.4%
Company Deep Dive
A 10,000-word report: the business and its segments, what management promised on earnings calls and whether it delivered, the competition, and how things could turn out.