INSW
Premium GrowerAI neutralInternational Seaways, Inc. · Energy · United States · $5.7B cap · $80.1M/day traded
$98.02 +3.8% · close 6 Nov · scored 7 Nov
Score up 1.5 since 6 Nov: Momentum up 3 after a 4% price rise.
Premium Grower: Strong business with the market behind it, priced at a premium.
Around its 5 Nov results, analysts left next year's EPS estimate little changed.
As of 7 Nov 2026, the MoatMap Score for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) is 92/100, ranked against 25,000+ stocks in 38 markets (Quality 82, Value 41, Momentum 73, each scored against its sector).
Does the score work? Each tenth of the ranking, tracked monthly. See the record →
International Seaways owns a modern fleet of crude and product tankers and reported record results in the second quarter of 2026. Tanker shares rallied in September on Hormuz disruption. Longer voyages and product market tightness support rates, and the balance sheet has improved. The recent rally has priced in much of the good news, and tanker earnings swing with fleet supply and the course of the conflict.
ABOUT INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC.
Read
International Seaways, Inc. is a leading tanker company providing marine transportation services for crude oil and petroleum products worldwide. The company's competitive moat is its modern, high-quality fleet of crude and product tankers, operational efficiency, and a strong safety record, which attracts blue-chip charterers. As a significant player in the global tanker market, International Seaways capitalizes on global energy demand and seaborne trade dynamics.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY (USD)
| Year | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | CAGR | TTM | 2026E | 2027E | Fwd CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 864.7M | 1.1B | 951.6M | 843.3M | -0.8% | 1.6B | 1.7B | 1.2B | 17.7% |
| EPS | 7.85 | 11.35 | 8.45 | 6.27 | -7.2% | 21.11 | 26.94 | 8.92 | 19.3% |
| Shares | 49.1M | 48.9M | 49.2M | 49.4M | +0.6% | 51.2M | — | — | — |
| Debt | 1.1B | 744.5M | 711.7M | 576.2M | -18.8% | 706.9M | — | — | — |
| Equity | 1.5B | 1.7B | 1.9B | 2.0B | 10.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Op CF | 287.8M | 688.4M | 547.1M | 380.1M | 9.7% | 797.8M | — | — | — |
| Inv CF | 42.8M | -124.3M | -155.0M | -141.3M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fin CF | -185.8M | -681.1M | -361.4M | -279.3M | — | — | — | — | — |
No clear trend: not near its 52-week low, and not in a steady uptrend.
Calmer than 52% of stocks we rank over the past year (volatility 41% a year).
How this is worked out
The MoatMap Score weighs the business, its price and its trend. The price check reads only the chart: the price side of the Momentum score, in words.
The rules: Still falling is a new 52-week low in the last two weeks, at least 25% below the high. Finding a floor is no new low since. Turning up is 20 or more trading days without a new low, at least 10% off it, and back above a rising 50-day average. In an uptrend is above the 200-day average and within 15% of the high.
In 2,112 US drawdowns since 2001, buying while the price was still falling was followed by a further 20% drop 42% of the time. Waiting for a turn (the Turning up rule above) cut that to 33%, at about 7% higher prices and with no better returns. Part of that cut is simply not buying: 13% of falls never turned, and waiting kept those out. Among turns that were bought, 38% still fell another 20%, and 33% of turns were followed by a new low within six months. The benefit was largest in crashes such as 2008 and 2020.
What it measures: how much the price moved day to day over the past year, scaled to a yearly figure (annualised volatility) and ranked against every stock we cover. Very calm under 20% a year, Calm 20 to 30%, Average 30 to 40%, Bumpy 40 to 55%, Very bumpy above that.
What we found: across about 13,500 stocks in 34 markets (2002 to 2025), past swings were a good guide to the next year's, and bumpier stocks fell further. How much further changed too much between eras to put a number on it.
Calm is not safe: a calm stock can still slide steadily.
Rules fixed before any data was fetched. Describes the chart, not a recommendation.
SCORE BREAKDOWN
FUNDAMENTALS
SECTOR PEERS
Closest peers in Energy, ranked by industry match, size, and score similarity. Cross-listings of INSW are excluded.
| Ticker | Company | Mkt Cap | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| INSW | International Seaways, Inc.(you) | $5.7B | 92 |
| LPG | Dorian LPG Ltd. | $2.3B | 95 |
| PAGP | Plains GP Holdings, L.P. | $6.7B | 72 |
| HESM | Hess Midstream LP | $6.3B | 63 |
| PAA | Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | $18.8B | 75 |
| GLP | Global Partners LP | $1.6B | 75 |
| PBT | Permian Basin Royalty Trust | $1.6B | 75 |
| SBR | Sabine Royalty Trust | $1.1B | 75 |
| EE | Excelerate Energy, Inc. | $3.7B | 47 |
| AM | Antero Midstream Corporation | $9.9B | 45 |
Peer medians: ROE 10.2% · P/E 14.1x · Gross margin 44.8%
Company Deep Dive
A 10,000-word report: the business and its segments, what management promised on earnings calls and whether it delivered, the competition, and how things could turn out.